Hello Robert, Thank you for reviewing this draft. Sorry for the long response time.
Version -39 addresses your comment, adding a sentence to bridge the comments as you suggested. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-39 Regards, Ludwig > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: den 25 mars 2021 12:30 > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-ace-oauth- > authz-38: (with COMMENT) > > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-38: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory > paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > One minor comment: I found it a slight leap in the introduction in the final > paragraph ("More detailed, ...") that talks about interoperable specifications > (implying that specification is not interoperable) and profiles (where it > isn't > clear where these have come from). So, an extra sentence to bridge the > concepts might be helpful in the introduction. As a nit, the paragraph is > also > missing a comma in "interoperate while". > > _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
