Hi Daniel, I plan to be present at IETF 116 and the ACE meeting. I agree with much of what Carsten writes. At the f2f meetings we usually get valuable input from people who not normally attend interims (if we arrange for stimulating such discussions).
Göran From: Ace <[email protected]> on behalf of Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 19 December 2022 at 10:56 To: Daniel Migault <[email protected]> Cc: Ace Wg <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ace] Meeting in Yokhohama ? Hi Daniel, > We would like to consider meeting in the IETF 116 in Yokohama. To confirm the > meeting request, we would like to get an idea of: > 1- who is planning to attend the session remotely or face to face as well as I plan to be present. > 2 - what should be discussed that cannot be discussed during interim meetings A lot of things can be discussed. The question is whether we get the people that we want to have for the discussion in the room. A formal meeting session at an IETF meeting has a stronger draw. We usually have much serendipity in having the right people around. Occasionally, pushing discussions into interim meetings can be beneficial; e.g., if we need more guest-like appearances (from people who wouldn’t be as inclined to pay meeting fees). Periodic interim meetings are also good for tracking progress and deciding little things. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
