Hi Daniel, I’d prefer if the wg met at IETF116 rather than have an interim: participation is usually much higher during the IETF week, as it allows people who can’t make the interims to drop by.
Francesca From: Ace <[email protected]> on behalf of Cigdem Sengul <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, 12 January 2023 at 14:56 To: Daniel Migault <[email protected]> Cc: Ace Wg <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Ace] Meeting in Yokhohama ? Hello Daniel, I may not be able to attend IETF 116 due to a clash with other commitments, but if I can, it will have to be remote. Kind regards, --Cigdem On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 14:57, Daniel Migault <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, We would like to consider meeting in the IETF 116 in Yokohama. To confirm the meeting request, we would like to get an idea of: 1- who is planning to attend the session remotely or face to face as well as 2 - what should be discussed that cannot be discussed during interim meetings Yours, Daniel -- Daniel Migault Ericsson _______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
