We had a reviview from the Security Directorate and the General Directorate. What I think you are saying is that there are some updates to be done to address the Security Directorate comments. If so, yes Mohit, please update the document accordingly and respond to Valery. If you can do that today that would be great. I do not see this as a serious issue, and unless there are other issues, maybe Paul can try to push the draft to the IESG ?
Yours, Daniel On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 8:16 AM Brockhaus, Hendrik < [email protected]> wrote: > If I am correct, the SecDir review is not complete. > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/vZJDmEsWxvhKcjGVOOTj8QnZ3ns/ > > Hendrik > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Daniel Migault <[email protected]> > > Gesendet: Montag, 16. Januar 2023 14:02 > > An: Brockhaus, Hendrik (T CST SEA-DE) <[email protected]>; > > Mohit Sahni <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]>; Fries, Steffen (T > > CST) <[email protected]>; von Oheimb, David (T CST SEA-DE) > > <[email protected]>; Saurabh Tripathi > > <[email protected]> > > Betreff: Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04 > > > > Hi, > > > > From my perspective it is in the hands of our ADs. Can you please > clarify the > > status as well as if there is anything we are expected to do. > > > > In the history I can see: > > 2022-10-12 05 Paul Wouters IESG state changed to Last Call > Requested from > > AD Evaluation > > > > So I suppose, this is pretty much baked. The last note is the following > one: > > > > 2022-10-27 05 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for > Writeup from In > > Last Call > > > > We I interpret as considering the comments received from the LC. > > > > Yours, > > Daniel > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: Brockhaus, Hendrik <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 7:49 AM > > To: Mohit Sahni; Daniel Migault > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; Benjamin Kaduk; Fries, Steffen; von Oheimb, > David; > > Saurabh Tripathi > > Subject: AW: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04 > > > > Mohit, Daniel > > > > In the meantime, the Lightweight CMP Profile passed the IESG review and > is on > > its way for publication. > > Also, the BRSKI-AE draft is in the last review rounds. > > Both drafts and also CMP Algorithms and CMP Updates require publication > of > > CMPoverCoAP. > > What is the status of this draft and when do you think it it is ready for > > publication? > > > > Hendrik > > > > > > Von: Ace <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Mohit Sahni > > > > > > > > Hi Ben and Hello Paul, > > > > I have published a new version for the draft that incorporates Ben's > > > > Comments, I am sorry for the long delay that happened due to some > > > > personal reasons. I want to thank Hendrik for his help and support in > > > > resolving these comments. > > > > > > > > In summary, I have accepted all the comments suggested by Ben except > this > > > > one: > > > [...] > -- Daniel Migault Ericsson
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
