On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:46 AM Daniel Migault <[email protected]> wrote:
> We had a reviview from the Security Directorate and the > General Directorate. What I think you are saying is that there are some > updates to be done to address the Security Directorate comments. If so, yes > Mohit, please update the document accordingly and respond to Valery. If you > can do that today that would be great. > I do not see this as a serious issue, and unless there are other issues, > maybe Paul can try to push the draft to the IESG ? > Sorry about dropping the ball on this one. Yes, it was waiting on resolving Valery's comments in the secdir mail exchange: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ace/IcJbf2stWcktjIoepyxT0ePq_pI/ If we can get a document update for that, we can move it onwards. Paul > Yours, > Daniel > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 8:16 AM Brockhaus, Hendrik < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> If I am correct, the SecDir review is not complete. >> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/vZJDmEsWxvhKcjGVOOTj8QnZ3ns/ >> >> Hendrik >> >> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> > Von: Daniel Migault <[email protected]> >> > Gesendet: Montag, 16. Januar 2023 14:02 >> > An: Brockhaus, Hendrik (T CST SEA-DE) <[email protected]>; >> > Mohit Sahni <[email protected]> >> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; >> > [email protected]; Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]>; Fries, Steffen >> (T >> > CST) <[email protected]>; von Oheimb, David (T CST SEA-DE) >> > <[email protected]>; Saurabh Tripathi >> > <[email protected]> >> > Betreff: Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04 >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > From my perspective it is in the hands of our ADs. Can you please >> clarify the >> > status as well as if there is anything we are expected to do. >> > >> > In the history I can see: >> > 2022-10-12 05 Paul Wouters IESG state changed to Last Call >> Requested from >> > AD Evaluation >> > >> > So I suppose, this is pretty much baked. The last note is the following >> one: >> > >> > 2022-10-27 05 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for >> Writeup from In >> > Last Call >> > >> > We I interpret as considering the comments received from the LC. >> > >> > Yours, >> > Daniel >> > >> > ________________________________________ >> > From: Brockhaus, Hendrik <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 7:49 AM >> > To: Mohit Sahni; Daniel Migault >> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; >> > [email protected]; Benjamin Kaduk; Fries, Steffen; von Oheimb, >> David; >> > Saurabh Tripathi >> > Subject: AW: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04 >> > >> > Mohit, Daniel >> > >> > In the meantime, the Lightweight CMP Profile passed the IESG review and >> is on >> > its way for publication. >> > Also, the BRSKI-AE draft is in the last review rounds. >> > Both drafts and also CMP Algorithms and CMP Updates require publication >> of >> > CMPoverCoAP. >> > What is the status of this draft and when do you think it it is ready >> for >> > publication? >> > >> > Hendrik >> > >> > > > Von: Ace <[email protected]> Im Auftrag von Mohit Sahni >> > > > >> > > > Hi Ben and Hello Paul, >> > > > I have published a new version for the draft that incorporates Ben's >> > > > Comments, I am sorry for the long delay that happened due to some >> > > > personal reasons. I want to thank Hendrik for his help and support >> in >> > > > resolving these comments. >> > > > >> > > > In summary, I have accepted all the comments suggested by Ben >> except this >> > > > one: >> > > [...] >> > > > -- > Daniel Migault > Ericsson >
_______________________________________________ Ace mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace
