Daniel

Thank you! That would be highly appreciated :-)

Hendrik

Von: Daniel Migault <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Montag, 16. Januar 2023 15:46
An: Brockhaus, Hendrik (T CST SEA-DE) <[email protected]>
Cc: Mohit Sahni <[email protected]>; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]>; Fries, Steffen (T CST) 
<[email protected]>; von Oheimb, David (T CST SEA-DE) 
<[email protected]>; Saurabh Tripathi 
<[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04

We had a reviview from the Security Directorate and the General Directorate. 
What I think you are saying is that there are some updates to be done to 
address the Security Directorate comments. If so, yes Mohit, please update the 
document accordingly and respond to Valery. If you can do that today that would 
be great.
I do not see this as a serious issue, and unless there are other issues, maybe 
Paul can try to push the draft to the IESG ?

Yours,
Daniel


On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 8:16 AM Brockhaus, Hendrik 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
If I am correct, the SecDir review is not complete.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/vZJDmEsWxvhKcjGVOOTj8QnZ3ns/<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fsecdir%2FvZJDmEsWxvhKcjGVOOTj8QnZ3ns%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chendrik.brockhaus%40siemens.com%7C538629cd3fe448b3ffab08daf7d07b3b%7C38ae3bcd95794fd4addab42e1495d55a%7C1%7C0%7C638094772034433608%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NmW49hqy5BrJZ0fv2D0g2XKkssooOCYwrmqskkVVNU8%3D&reserved=0>

Hendrik

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Daniel Migault 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Gesendet: Montag, 16. Januar 2023 14:02
> An: Brockhaus, Hendrik (T CST SEA-DE) 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>;
> Mohit Sahni <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Cc: 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
>  [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Benjamin Kaduk 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Fries, Steffen (T
> CST) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; von 
> Oheimb, David (T CST SEA-DE)
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Saurabh 
> Tripathi
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Betreff: Re: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04
>
> Hi,
>
> From my perspective it is in the hands of our ADs. Can you please clarify the
> status as well as if there is anything we are expected to do.
>
> In the history I can see:
> 2022-10-12 05   Paul Wouters    IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from
> AD Evaluation
>
> So I suppose, this is pretty much baked. The last note is the following one:
>
> 2022-10-27 05   (System)        IESG state changed to Waiting for Writeup 
> from In
> Last Call
>
> We I interpret as considering the comments received from the LC.
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Brockhaus, Hendrik 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 7:49 AM
> To: Mohit Sahni; Daniel Migault
> Cc: 
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
>  [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Benjamin Kaduk; Fries, 
> Steffen; von Oheimb, David;
> Saurabh Tripathi
> Subject: AW: [Ace] AD review of draft-ietf-ace-cmpv2-coap-transport-04
>
> Mohit, Daniel
>
> In the meantime, the Lightweight CMP Profile passed the IESG review and is on
> its way for publication.
> Also, the BRSKI-AE draft is in the last review rounds.
> Both drafts and also CMP Algorithms and CMP Updates require publication of
> CMPoverCoAP.
> What is the status of this draft and when do you think it it is ready for
> publication?
>
> Hendrik
>
> > > Von: Ace <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Im Auftrag 
> > > von Mohit Sahni
> > >
> > > Hi Ben and Hello Paul,
> > > I have published a new version for the draft that incorporates Ben's
> > > Comments, I am sorry for the long delay that happened due to some
> > > personal reasons. I want to thank Hendrik for his help and support in
> > > resolving these comments.
> > >
> > > In summary, I have accepted all the comments suggested by Ben except this
> > > one:
> > [...]


--
Daniel Migault
Ericsson
_______________________________________________
Ace mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace

Reply via email to