as the situation is now I am against removing the PoP becase it is really helpful when the automation cannot do its thing (there are so many reasons why you cant really automate everything. but when there will be some other changes to the challenges which would make it a bit more humanly possible to create a SAN certificate with more than just 2 domains.
regards 2016-03-21 3:14 GMT+01:00 Richard Barnes <[email protected]>: > Hey all, > > I've published a two PRs that I think should be non-controversial, but > they're significant enough that I wanted to run them by the group. I would > appreciate it if you could take a look and give a quick thumbs up / thumbs > down in Github (at the indicated URIs). If you have any substantive > comments, please reply in this thread. > > #101 Remove proof-of-possession challenge > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/101 > > #102 Replace in-band account recovery with `meta` > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/102 > > I'm happy to hold any of these if they need more discussion, but if > there's no disagreement before the I-D deadline at midnight UTC, I'll go > ahead and merge them before I post -02. > > Thanks, > --Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
