On 03/20/2016 07:14 PM, Richard Barnes wrote: > #101 Remove proof-of-possession challenge > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/101 This looks fine. As an implementer, I think we may want to implement some proof-of-possession concept in the future, but I think this mechanism is not quite right. And we should take it out till we're more confident in what we want to do.
> #102 Replace in-band account recovery with `meta` > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/102 This is pretty ambiguous. In the spirit of the above, I would leave this unspecified until we have a clearer idea of what we want out of this. As a process point: I'm guessing there is some meta list where deadlines for I-Ds are posted, but I'm not on it. Would you mind cross-posting a reminder about such deadlines to the ACME list a couple weeks in advance, so we have more time to consider and work on changes like these? Thanks, Jacob _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
