OK, thanks all. On balance, feedback here seems OK, so I'm going to go ahead and merge. We can look at adding back some sort of PoP / recovery, but I agree with Jacob that these are better un-spec'ed for the moment.
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I've published a two PRs that I think should be non-controversial, but > they're significant enough that I wanted to run them by the group. I would > appreciate it if you could take a look and give a quick thumbs up / thumbs > down in Github (at the indicated URIs). If you have any substantive > comments, please reply in this thread. > > #101 Remove proof-of-possession challenge > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/101 > > #102 Replace in-band account recovery with `meta` > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/102 > > I'm happy to hold any of these if they need more discussion, but if > there's no disagreement before the I-D deadline at midnight UTC, I'll go > ahead and merge them before I post -02. > > Thanks, > --Richard > >
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
