On 08/18/2016 11:25 AM, Roland Bracewell Shoemaker wrote: > draft-03 introduces a 'status' field on the registration object with the > values 'good' or 'deactivated'. I propose two changes to this, using > 'valid' instead of 'good', which better matches the other statuses used > elsewhere in the specification
Works for me. > and adding language to the new > registration section indicating that if a server requires a user to > agree to terms of service that a third status, 'pending', should be used > until the terms are agreed to. In https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/167 (Simplify terms-of-service flow), the plan is for servers that require agreement to require it as part of registration, so you'd never have a pending registration. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
