On 08/18/2016 11:32 AM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote: > On 08/18/2016 11:25 AM, Roland Bracewell Shoemaker wrote: >> draft-03 introduces a 'status' field on the registration object with the >> values 'good' or 'deactivated'. I propose two changes to this, using >> 'valid' instead of 'good', which better matches the other statuses used >> elsewhere in the specification > > Works for me. > >> and adding language to the new >> registration section indicating that if a server requires a user to >> agree to terms of service that a third status, 'pending', should be used >> until the terms are agreed to. > > In https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/167 (Simplify > terms-of-service flow), the plan is for servers that require agreement > to require it as part of registration, so you'd never have a pending > registration. >
Ah! That's even better then. > _______________________________________________ > Acme mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
