On Aug 18, 2016, at 2:25 PM, Roland Bracewell Shoemaker <[email protected]> wrote:
> draft-03 introduces a 'status' field on the registration object with the > values 'good' or 'deactivated'. I propose two changes to this, using > 'valid' instead of 'good', which better matches the other statuses used > elsewhere in the specification and adding language to the new > registration section indicating that if a server requires a user to > agree to terms of service that a third status, 'pending', should be used > until the terms are agreed to. > > Any objections/thoughts? No objection. I wonder if there is a third status needed. If someone claims that they lost their account key and the out-of-band process has begun to establish a new one, then neither of these two seems to fit. Russ _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
