PRs have been updated to address comments.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Daniel McCarney <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I added some minor editorial feedback on #207[0] and #208[1].
>
> Thanks for collecting these up Richard!
>
> [0] - https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/207
> [1] - https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/208
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hey ACME folks,
>>
>> I've posted a few PRs implementing decisions made at the F2F:
>>
>> #207 - Change agreementRequired to userActionRequired
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/207
>>
>> #208 - Remove the 'requirements' abstraction
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/208
>>
>> #209 - Add an external account binding field
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/209
>>
>> #210 - Terminology update
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/210
>>
>> (Note that #210 is based on top of #208, so the diff to master will look
>> bigger than it actually is until #208 lands.)
>>
>> #211 - Add registries for fields in account and order objects
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/211
>>
>> I would appreciate if you could put in any comments on these by Monday,
>> Nov 28.
>>
>> Chairs: I would like to make an editorial pass on the document this week,
>> but otherwise, once these land, I think the doc is ready for WGLC.
>>
>> --Richard
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Acme mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Acme mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme

Reply via email to