On 29 November 2016 at 13:37, Richard Barnes <r...@ipv.sx> wrote: > I actually thought you were the one that suggested we keep the "status" > fields :) The minutes not being dispositive, I pulled up the audio > recording of the meeting ([1], around 35:00), and didn't find anything there > either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
FWIW, I remember you mentioning that you would like to retain the status fields, but it might have been non-verbal communication that indicated assent. Both approaches have their merits: either pick simplicity, or make the extra information available where it is immediately useful. As you say, there's a pretty big saving if status is there. A client then only has to act on unresolved challenges. _______________________________________________ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
