(Everyone get your bike shed paint out....) In talking with a few folks around the community, I've heard people refer to the IETF version of ACME as "v2", where implicitly "v1" is the initial version deployed by Let's Encrypt and its clients right now.
How would people feel about reflecting this in the draft / RFC? I've posted a PR with the changes this would entail: https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/321 The only question this raises for me is what to do about v1. Given that Let's Encrypt has evolved their interface some since the first version, I'm not sure there's one consolidated spec out there for what they currently have deployed. So while it would be nice to have a reference to v1 in this document if we make it v2, I'm not inclined to worry about it too much. I'm willing to leave it up to the LE folks if they want to submit a v1 later for historical purposes. Any objections to merging the above PR? --Richard
_______________________________________________ Acme mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
