https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16396





--- Comment #40 from Eric Valette <eric.vale...@free.fr>  2010-07-30 08:31:26 
---
1) you marked the bug 16311 as a duplicate of this one although it is older
given the number. Fine but at least take care of information the bug 16311
contains,
2) I explicitly state in bug 16311 that acpi_sleep=nonvs fixes my suspend
problem
3) We currently have 3 brand (IBM, HP, futjitsu) that brakes with new code. I
bet you will likely get a lot more as soon as people will try official 2.6.35
kernel
4) If you find a way to make it work enabled fine, if not you know that you
will introduce a kernel with know severe regression for laptop user. You have
no clue on the percentage of failing compared to the percentage of people that
will benefit from it. So why explicitly allowing a know regression with no
obvious benefit?
5) When you say its what windows does, maybe it does it a different/better way
(e.g remapping the wrong BIOS IO region as done on boot if I read the io region
problem correctly)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla

Reply via email to