https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15100
--- Comment #71 from Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> 2011-01-10 18:51:31 --- BTW, the scenario is: - boot docked (dock contains a UART) - make a PNP serial device - suspend to RAM - undock - dock.c notices UART removal - remove the ACPI companion device of the PNP serial device - resume the PNP serial device - oops (unless we check that ACPI companion is gone, which is what DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE) does. [Yes, we should remove the PNP device at this point, but it isn't safe with the current code in pnpacpi.] DEVICE_ACPI_HANDLE() should be used in there anyway, because it returns the _right_ cached ACPI handle instead of the "copy" from pnp_dev->data->handle which is completely redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web. Learn how to best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ acpi-bugzilla mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
