> on 02-04-2003 15:59, Aparajita Fishman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> We're using ITK (in combination with webstar for static file serving), >> the reasons are: >> - Multi-homing >> - Full control of HTTP response header >> - Max content-length (< 4D2003) >> - No /4DCGI/ weirdness >> - 4D Client running as HTTP server >> - Works on multiple 4D versions > > Thanks for the response and the detailed reasons. Just out of > curiosity, was it something I said or wrote that made you aware of > these issues or were they issues that arose independent of Active4D?
We are hosting several 4D web solutions, using ITK or the 4D build in webserver (with or without a4d) and the ITK based solution gives us more flexibility and control. To answer you're question: these issues arose independent of a4d. Regards, Daniel -- Eye-d creative productions Alexanderstraat 10 - 2011 VE Haarlem Postbus 1026 - 2001 BA Haarlem Phone +31 (0)23 542 65 30 - Fax +31 (0)23 542 73 00 Email. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web. www.eye-d.nl
