I guess it depends on how difficult it is. I would opt to parallel 4D and support the current version and the prior version.
My $.02 Mike Vogt Millennium Data Services, Inc. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Aparajita Fishman > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 1:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Active4d-dev] minimum 4d version > > Hi, > > Your thoughts on the minimum 4D version I should support for > v4? I am not going to support 6.5, I know that. The question > is whether it is worth supporting 6.7. > > Regards, > > Aparajita > Victory-Heart Productions > www.aparajitaworld.com > > "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." > - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoylibrary.com > > _______________________________________________ > Active4D-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev > Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/ > _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
