I appreciate your consideration of our needs in this reguard. I would rather have you expend your time working on new features than worrying about backwards compatibility. 2003 OSX/ WinXP is fine by us.
Cheers, Oliver On 8/21/05, Jim Redfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Aparajita, > > I would think that v4 could be restricted to v2003 and later or even > 2004 and later. This would allow you to target the most modern > version of 4D and allow you to potentially use features only > available on the latest versions and devote your valuable programming > skills to non-legacy environments. If someone has legacy applications > that have not been converted to v2003 or later, they can continue to > use v3. If they are new to A4D then they can choose v4 if they have > the necessary version of 4D. > > That happens all the time during transitions to major new environments. > > Jim Redfield > > On Aug 19, 2005, at 10:45 AM, Aparajita Fishman wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Your thoughts on the minimum 4D version I should support for v4? I > > am not going to support 6.5, I know that. The question is whether > > it is worth supporting 6.7. > > > > Regards, > > > > Aparajita > > Victory-Heart Productions > > www.aparajitaworld.com > > > > "If you dare to fail, you are bound to succeed." > > - Sri Chinmoy | www.srichinmoylibrary.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Active4D-dev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev > > Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Active4D-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev > Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/ > _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
