Yes, Software Assurance. We were in the SUS-SA beta program but 2.0 never really came up in detail, just some vague predictions in response to comments about the beta.
Note to self- Nag TAM about 2.0 :-] SA looks & feels like the exact same product as the standard version, just expands the products covered. If you don't already have SA on all the products....no joy. Kind of whets the appetitite and makes you reconsider SMS2003 and the other commercial alternatives -----Original Message----- From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS? It might be more precise to say SUS 2.0. What is SUS-SA? Software Assurance??? SUS 2.0 I have seen in it's development bits, and it is a huge step forward for the tool to do real patch management. Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT Microsoft MVP - Active Directory Associate Expert Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Free, Bob > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Are you talking SUS-SA? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:56 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SUS? > > > John, > > I can't tell you anything more other than the next version > should greatly please and satisfy. Look for it Q4. > > Rick Kingslan MCSE, MCSA, MCT > Microsoft MVP - Active Directory > Associate Expert > Expert Zone - www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Balos > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:28 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I am currently using it and I like it. I think I would much > rather use > > something like sms though only because it's capable of > doing so much > > more. > > > > Just my two cents...... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Weston Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:30 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [ActiveDir] SUS? > > > > Has anyone deployed (or like using) SUS? (Software Update > > Services) within AD? Just curious to see what others think about > > this.. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Wes > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > > List archive: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
