|
If you are planning on implementing AD, I would suggest using MS DNS. Just to save you a few headaches.
On the other hand, I have never heard of Win2k 2003, so I am talking out my ass here.
Thank you, **<Good|Cheap|Fast> (Pick Two)** -----Original Message-----
Hi, we are planning the upgrade from NT to Win2k 2003. Currently we use Unix DNS, the question is should I keep it just make sure it supports NDR records or replace it with Microsoft DNS. Any pros and cons? Thanks, |
Title: Bind or Microsoft DNS
- [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Juan Ibarra
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Rick Kingslan
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Diane Ayers
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Lawrence, Mitchell
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Ken Cornetet
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Bridges, Samantha
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Juan Ibarra
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS John Reijnders
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Mulnick, Al
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS james . cate
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Free, Bob
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Free, Bob
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Strand, Ted
- RE: [ActiveDir] Bind or Microsoft DNS Ken Cornetet
