Eric,

Being as you are with MS - I will direct this part of the query at you.  We have a 
subscription to MSDN and I have the evaluation version of W2K3 from that subscription. 
 We have not yet purchased "live copies" of W2K3 - the purchasing folks are looking 
into whether the purchase plan for the W2K products would allow an upgrade issue of 
W2K3.

Anyway, from a MS standpoint - will I be able to safely do a forestprep of the empty 
root [both test bed and production configurations] with the evaluation copy of W2K3 - 
or will I have to have the real thing?  In advance, thanks for your time and trouble...

R/Bill

 -----Original Message-----
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  On Behalf Of Eric Fleischman
Sent:   Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:56 AM
To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:        RE: [ActiveDir] W2K SCHEMA EXTEND

Umm....."gpo for windows xp attributes"? What does that mean?
I assume that means that you can use XP settings in a group policy in a 2k domain. If 
that is what you mean, that's completely independent of the schema in AD, whether you 
have extended it for 2k03 or not. That is just a function of the ADM files you have 
imported in to that policy.
 
~Eric
 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Sent: Tue 8/10/2004 8:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W2K SCHEMA EXTEND


You read correctly.  Once the schema is extended, you can apply what ever needed those 
attributes (i.e., GPO for Windows XP attributes) with the MMC snap-ins containing the 
names of those attributes.
Ken Adams 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brown, Bill [contractor]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W2K SCHEMA EXTEND


Ken,
 
Thanks for the reply - your answer pretty much fits in with what I had intended to do. 
 Once the replication is out to all DCs - then anything that needed to work with the 
extended schema could - is that correct?  Or am I reading between the lines?
 
R/Bill
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adams, Kenneth W (Ken)
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] W2K SCHEMA EXTEND
 
If you read the upgrade documentation for W2K3, you will find that you have to extend 
the forest schema before you install the first W2K3 DC.  Extend the schema on the 
empty root domain with the forestprep option, then allow sufficient time for the 
schema extension to replicate through ALL DCs in your forest.
Ken Adams 
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brown, Bill [contractor]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 8:24 AM
To: ActiveDirList
Subject: [ActiveDir] W2K SCHEMA EXTEND
To All,
I have recently been advised that one of the domains within our forest has a need to 
start using some of the W2K3 attributes.  The current setup throughout the forest is 
W2K and SP4 with an empty root and then child domains truncated on downward.  The 
forest will be migrated to W2K3 at some point in the not too distant future - but it 
will not be in time to satisfy the needs of this one domain.
Is it possible for me to extend the forest schema [presume from the empty root] by 
running W2K3 forestprep and staying at the current W2K?
R/Bill
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to