That's enterprise edition. :-) Standard edition is $5,000.
According to http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/faq.asp The cutover point for enterprise edition is 80 CALs, for standard edition it is 24 CALs. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question Not really. I had someone get a quote of SQL 2000 at a per processor and it was $20K. A server license and 200 CALS would be cheaper. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question Yes, they do. Any user that might ever access the SQL server needs a CAL (unless you have a per-processor license). If you have 200 users, you need 200 CALs. A per-processor license would be cheaper. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 2:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question I looked over that link already. If I buy 50 PER USER Cals for 200 users to use then only a max of 50 at any given time can connect to SQL. When they disconnect from SQL, they don't hold onto the license do they? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B. Smith Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question NO. SQL does not support concurrent use licensing. It is per-seat licensing or per-processor licensing. You should read the link that Jeff provided. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra, Justin A. Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question So if I had a SQL Server, just one, and had 50 USER Cals with 200 users but no more then 25 or 30 of the 200 users would be accessing the server at any given time, then this would okay? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Salisbury Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:43 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question Just the opposite is true! Per-Server licensing would be where you tie a certain number of CALs to the server and that many users/devices can connect to just that server at any given time. These CALs cannot be assigned to any other SQL server while they are tied to the original SQL server. In Per-Seat licensing, you tie the CALs to specific users or devices which can then access any SQL server. As many users/devices as have CALs can access a given server concurrently. The last option is to buy per-processor licenses, which allows an unlimited number of users (who don't need CALs) to access the SQL server. You probably want to read the SQL Server 2000 Pricing and Licensing White Paper here, and think about whether you want to by Device CALs or User CALs: http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/sqlserverlicensing.asp. Jeff Jeff Salisbury Network Infrastructure and Security Manager Belkin Corporation Information Services 310 604-2061 310 604-2022 fax www.belkin.com -----Original Message----- From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question I just have a quick licensing question for SQL, SQL's per seat licensing is for concurrent connection right? Justin A. Salandra, MCSE Senior Network Engineer Catholic Healthcare System 212.752.7300 - office 917.455.0110 - cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ Confidential This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Belkin Corporation and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are not one of the named recipients or otherwise have reason to believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
