Yes they do. Every user who connects to SQL must have a CAL, regardless of whether or 
not they're connected:
 
You have five users:
 
Bill
Bob
Mary
Jane
Sue
 
You own three user cals and one sequel box:
 
Your five users connect in this order:
 
Mary 
Sue
Bob
Jane
Bill
 
 
The first three are given access and assigned a cal. The last two are denied access 
until you do one of the following:
 
revoke two of the first three's cals (now they can't get in)
Buy more user cals and assign them to the server
 
If you buy a processor license, every user in your wan can connect. You cannot have 
external users (random joe's on the net) access the server ntil you buy an external 
connector which is like a super cal for all anonymous users on the net.
 
This make sense?
 
--Brian

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Tue 8/24/2004 1:12 PM 
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question
        
        

        I looked over that link already.  If I buy 50 PER USER Cals for 200
        users to use then only a max of 50 at any given time can connect to SQL.
        When they disconnect from SQL, they don't hold onto the license do they?
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael B.
        Smith
        Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:58 PM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question
        
        NO.
        
        SQL does not support concurrent use licensing. It is per-seat licensing
        or per-processor licensing.
        
        You should read the link that Jeff provided.
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Salandra,
        Justin A.
        Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:52 PM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question
        
        So if I had a SQL Server, just one, and had 50 USER Cals with 200 users
        but no more then 25 or 30 of the 200 users would be accessing the server
        at any given time, then this would okay?
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Salisbury
        Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 1:43 PM
        To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question
        
        Just the opposite is true! Per-Server licensing would be where you tie a
        certain number of CALs to the server and that many users/devices can
        connect to just that server at any given time. These CALs cannot be
        assigned to any other SQL server while they are tied to the original SQL
        server.
        
        In Per-Seat licensing, you tie the CALs to specific users or devices
        which can then access any SQL server. As many users/devices as have CALs
        can access a given server concurrently.
        
        The last option is to buy per-processor licenses, which allows an
        unlimited number of users (who don't need CALs) to access the SQL
        server.
        
        You probably want to read the SQL Server 2000 Pricing and Licensing
        White Paper here, and think about whether you want to by Device CALs or
        User CALs: http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/sqlserverlicensing.asp.
        
        Jeff
        
        Jeff Salisbury
        Network Infrastructure and Security Manager
        
        Belkin Corporation
        Information Services
        310 604-2061
        310 604-2022 fax
        www.belkin.com
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Salandra, Justin A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 10:31 AM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: SQL Licensing question
        
        I just have a quick licensing question for SQL, SQL's per seat licensing
        is for concurrent connection right?
        
        Justin A. Salandra, MCSE
        Senior Network Engineer
        Catholic Healthcare System
        212.752.7300 - office
        917.455.0110 - cell
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
        List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
        List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
        List archive:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
        
        Confidential
        This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Belkin
        Corporation and/or its affiliates, are confidential, and are intended
        solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is
        addressed.  If you are not one of the named recipients or otherwise have
        reason to believe that you have received this e-mail in error, please
        notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your
        computer.
        Any other use, retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying
        of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
        List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
        List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
        List archive:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
        List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
        List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
        List archive:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
        List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
        List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
        List archive:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
        List info   : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
        List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
        List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
        

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to