It will be interesting the first time this gets tested in a court of law...

It will very much depend on how the message was sent in the first
place.  Sending to a single individual will favor the plaintiff, but
sending to a list of some sort?  Advantage should go to the defendant
who I'm guessing will use the "If you put trade secrets on a post
card, you can't reasonably expect them to be secure" line of
defense...  :)


-ASB
 FAST, CHEAP, SECURE: Pick Any TWO
 http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/



On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:55:21 -0500, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd love to see case law - especially U.S. Federal. I know some companies
> that use it to assert that certain communication is privileged - even though
> the receiver may have never entered into such an agreement. I discussed it
> with my lawyer in November of last year and received the opinion that it
> hadn't been tested, at least in a Virginia court, and that it could go
> either way. (Note: this was on a very specific disclaimer with very specific
> language and my comment is about that disclaimer.)
>  
> I personally felt like my free speech rights were rather trampled on by that
> opinion.
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr
> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
> 
> Disclaimer (up front) I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice, merely
> my educated opinion.
>  
> I think the disclaimer acts as little more than a CYA.  In case somebody who
> receives the message does something improper with that information it lets
> the sender claim that they warned the recipient (accidental or not) that the
> message was confidential and not to be used by unauthorized persons.  That,
> in theory, gets the sender off the hook.
>  
> I don't think it really imposes any sanction for merely reading the message
> on the recipient.  Now if you were to receive the message, then send a copy
> of it to the media -- having been warned that it's confidential -- maybe
> you'd have a problem.  Maybe.
>  
> I'm not aware of it being tested in court, but perhaps it has been.
>  
> -Ben- 
> Ben M. Schorr, MCP, MVP, CNA 
> Operations Coordinator 
> Stockholm/KSG - Honolulu 
> Phone: (808) 535-1500 
> Mobile: (808) 351-5084 
> http://www.scgab.com
>  
> ________________________________
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
> Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 10:59 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Legal Question
> 
> Does anyone know if the disclaimer like the one below are actually legally
> binding on anyone? And if the answer is yes, has it ever really been tested
> in court? You don't have to agree to anything to read the email, you just
> look and by the point you see the disclaimer, it is too late, you have
> picked up the information in the note. The fact that you don't necessarily
> agree to it I think would mean you could forward it as you wish unless you
> worked for the company who stuck the disclaimer on the note in the first
> place. I think telling me I have to delete it if it doesn't pertain to me is
> like telling me I have to close my ears and forget anything I hear if a
> neighbor says something within my range and then says it can't be disclosed.
>  
>   joe
>  
>  
> ________________________________
> 
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stockbrugger, Brian
> L.
> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:45 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [ActiveDir] Creating user accounts, home folders and assigning
> permissions to user and groups
> 
> 
> 
> I need to create about 3400 user accounts, create home folders and assign
> the appropriate user and group permissions to the home drives automagically.
>  We are using Windows Server 2003 and AD with a single domain.
> 
>  
> 
> I know how to create the user accounts and home folders but not sure the
> best approach to assign the permissions.  Any suggestions on doing all three
> or at least the permissions part.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks - Brian
>
List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to