Title: Re: [ActiveDir] WINS

Some info regarding WINS requirement from Microsoft:

http://support.microsoft.com/?id=837391

 

Yandi

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Mezzone
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 10:18 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] WINS

 

Page 51 of the Planning an Exchange Server 2003 Messaging System.

"Exchange requires WINS (even though Windows does not)

There's no additional information as to why Exchange requires it. I'll take a look in the Exchange 2003 Technical Reference Guide to see if mentions anything about WINS.

Robert


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun Mar 06 14:34:01 2005
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WINS

Okay, I will  look into it also.  We removed WINS from our forest about a year ago and have seen no ill effects. We are not real big, 2000 exchange accounts and 25000 users, but everything seems to be running fine without it. Over the next few months, we are going to add student accounts to Exchange, so we will end up with quite a few more accounts.

If I find out anything I will post it.

Thanks,

glen
The University of Texas at Dallas


________________________________

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert Mezzone
        Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 1:20 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] WINS
       
       

        I'll look when I get home. I remember reading about it a year ago and was bummed out. I thought I could rid myself of wins. I did run Exchange without wins for a while but added it being MS recommends it. Only thing is it didn't give a reason why. Just said it was needed. It may not be the deployment guide, it's in one of the three recommended reading documents, deployment, admin guide and I forget the name of the other doc (planning an exchange environment?)
       
        Robert
       
       
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
        Sent: Sun Mar 06 13:27:42 2005
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WINS
       
        Just curious, where in the deployment guide does it say that Exchange 2003 needs WINS?  We are running a clustered Exchange 2003 setup and we don't have WINS configured on our domain.
       
        glen
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
        The University of Texas at Dallas
       
       
       
       
        ________________________________
       
                From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Robert Mezzone
                Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 12:20 PM
                To: [email protected]
                Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] WINS
              
              
       
                Unfortunetly it does. I thought it didn't until I read the deployment guide. Recently upgraded for 5.5.
              
                Robert
              
              
                -----Original Message-----
                From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
                Sent: Sun Mar 06 12:55:30 2005
                Subject: [ActiveDir] WINS
              
                Is WINS still needed for exchange 2003? Some have said outlook still needs
                WINS.
              
                List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
                List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
                List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
              
       
       

**********************************************************************

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they

are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify

the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by

MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

The Laryngeal Mask Company (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.

www.lmaco.com

**********************************************************************

Reply via email to