|
Ask him how the client workstations are going to find a DC
if DNS is down. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan DeStefano Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 2:45 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Well, he said that he
wanted it on domain controllers so that if DNS goes down that people can still
log on. But that is not the case, right? People can logon to a DC in AD as long
as that DC can query a GC, right? From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Did you
ask him if you could have the host file on his machine… that he MUST be using to
browse the web with? DNS untrustworthy vs host file…
bahaha From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Recently, one of my colleagues and I
got into a discussion about DNS vs. hosts files in AD. He has configured the
hosts file on all of our domain controllers (Windows 2000 AD in native mode) to
point to other DCs. One of our DCs was moved to another site and the hosts file
on a DC was not changed to point to the moved DC on its new subnet – this
obviously resulted in NTFRS errors. Anyway, after this I got into a
discussion with my boss about the need of the hosts file in AD. It is my
position that the hosts file is no longer necessary and should not really be
used in AD and is only included for backward-compatibility, testing and for
certain special instances. It is his position that DNS is untrustworthy and that
the hosts file should be configured as a backup in case DNS goes down. My
response to this was twofold – 1. the hosts file is queried before DNS so it is
not really a backup, it is a primary method of name-resolution, plus, it does
not support Could anyone point to any
documentation that discusses the role of the hosts file in AD and also include
your own opinions and comments. _________________________ PC Support
Specialist IAG
Research T. F. Measuring Ad Effectiveness on
Television The information contained in this
communication is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the
exclusive use of the above named addressee(s). If you are not the intended
recipient(s), you are expressly prohibited from copying, distributing,
disseminating, or in any other way using any of the information contained within
this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please
contact the sender by telephone |
- [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Dan DeStefano
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Douglas M. Long
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Dan DeStefano
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Coleman, Hunter
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Medeiros, Jose
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File deji
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Jorge de Almeida Pinto
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Gil Kirkpatrick
- Re: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Kern, Tom
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Rick Kingslan
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Medeiros, Jose
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Jorge de Almeida Pinto
- RE: [ActiveDir] DNS vs. Hosts File Gil Kirkpatrick
