What's your reason for using RAID 0+1 or RAID 10 for the transaction logs? RAID 1 should be more than adequate in terms of redundancy and performance.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kern, Tom Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:50 AM To: ActiveDir (E-mail) Subject: [ActiveDir] exchange upgrade (OT) I'm moving to exchange 2k3 and i'm starting off with a fresh new server We use HP proliant DL's here. My questions are - I want to use raid 0+1 or raid 10(deoending on price) for the trans logs. I want to keep the exchange binaries and db seperate from the logs on a raid 5. To do this, do i need 2 raid controllers or can i just do this with 1? alos the proliants seem to only support 6 drives and for this solution i will need at least 7. Has anyone had experince with doing this on proliants with the smart array 6i controller? Thanks a lot List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
