Could be referring to personal DL's? > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/09/21 Wed PM 03:39:53 EDT > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: exchange max. dist. list size > > I don't have exact figures, but your numbers are unbelievably low. 200 max? I > have DLs with 2300, and those are small. > > What gives you this impression? Are you using a tool that's barfing when > expanding DLs with more than 200 membership? > > > Sincerely, > > Dèjì Akómöláfé, MCSE+M MCSA+M MCP+I > Microsoft MVP - Directory Services > www.readymaids.com - we know IT > www.akomolafe.com > Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about > Yesterday? -anon > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed 9/21/2005 8:23 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: exchange max. dist. list size > > > > Has anyone encountered the max distribution list size in exchange? > > > > Seems like it's 8KB, or between 100-200 email addresses? > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > Thanks, > > James > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ >
List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
