|
Gil’s thoughts match with mine as
well. AD is a critical infrastructure component and designing it properly
is important. However, the real complexities of AD come into play as the ancillary
systems leveraging the directory increase and as multiple directories need to
be integrated in some fashion to support a great IdM need. One of the things that I would encourage
you to do is determine what your goals are. As Gil alluded to, if your
goals are to be able to design large AD deployments, you may be locking
yourself into an undesirable path. On the other hand, if you want to
become an expert at managing, operating and diagnosing AD you will have a
longer career life, but even that will become less important as the various
tools improve – that said, working in this role will likely give you
greater exposure to those ancillary systems. In general I would encourage you to have a
look at and understand Microsoft DSI and determine where in that mix your
interest lies. Conceptually DSI is the way forward regardless of what you
call it (Adaptive Enterprise, On Demand, etc.) or what technologies are
supporting it (MS or non-MS). Finding a sweet spot in that mix will
certainly prove to be valuable over the next 7 – 10 years. Also,
you might look at the Microsoft Certified Architect program and understand its
competencies and direction – I believe that this role in an organization is
becoming more valuable and will continue to increase over the next couple of
years. Regards, Aric Bernard From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Kirkpatrick Hiring on with an IT services company that
does large Windows projects would probably be the best way to develop the
experience you're looking for. That way you get exposure to many different
environments, requirements, people, and projects. HP, Internosis, LogicaCMG, and Microsoft
Consulting Services are some examples, and there are tens or hundreds of
others. Some smaller consulting companies like
Oxford Computer Group focus on IdM projects and will sometimes get pulled into
AD projects in an advisory capacity. From a career standpoint, I would look
more to the broader IdM technologies. AD expertise is rapidly becoming
comoditized, and in larger enterprise environments, AD is but one
component of the IdM and security infrastructure. Moving forward, MIIS and ADFS
are going to take center stage in the WIndows environment, and AD is going to
be pushed more into the background. AD will still be a critical component, and
there will always be a need for architects who can design large AD
infrastructures. But AD won't be where the action is. -gil From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long I am trying to figure out how one gauges their AD
experience. For example, I have designed, implemented and maintained an
AD/Exchange environment of 5000 users with 1000 workstations from the ground
up, alone. The environment is only 3 sites, with little complexity. I now work
for a company maintaining a directory of about 150 users and 150 workstations.
And the more local AD people I talk to, the more confident I am that I know
quite a bit about AD compared to them (only talking about the people I have
met…not generalizing the entire industry). Although I am not a guru like some on this list, I would
like to get myself to the place where I can say “yeah, I can design your
50,000 user / 15 site infrastructure.” Or is that even possible? Is a
project of that size several directory experts working together? I honestly believe that I could perform such a task, but
knowing that I would make some mistakes that a VERY experienced person would
not. So, I guess my question is: How do I get to where I want to be? Consult? Try to get a
job with the biggest company I can? There may be no real answer, but I thought it was worth
asking because I have been thinking about it for a couple of months and
don’t know where to start to move forward, and this is the only place I
know that has people that I consider AD gurus (or gods even) |
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experience Bernard, Aric
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Gil Kirkpatrick
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... al_maurer
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Robinson, Chuck
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... al_maurer
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Lee, Wook
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Hutchins, Mike
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Myrick, Todd \(NIH/CC/DNA\) [E]
- Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD ex... Kamlesh Parmar
