|
I would say focusing on the design of big directories is
pigeon-holing a little too much. There are only so many big directories that
need to be designed. I personally find much more fun in diagnosing good
directories that have gone bad than trying to design them. I design if I have to
but it isn't what I like. Plus often with the design, it is rarely the case
where you actually have all of the info though someone will tell you you do. You
find out you don't later on when someone starts complaining or something starts
breaking.
I am not sure I would go so far to say it is something you
let the tools handle though. A lot of the tools out there still aren't doing the
greatest job and there are many companies that don't want to spend the millions
on those tools that they would be charged for them instead having a few really
good people handling it. A tool doesn't see bad things coming when someone is
coming at you with the next great thing they want to plug into the AD. If the
tool does catch it, it is way too late in the integration cycle. Plus, what if
the tool isn't catching the problem? Someone has to be knowledgeable enough too.
If you depend solely on your tools to keep your AD running well it is possible
you are going to get cut pretty good. When I did Ops, I had several tools that
watched what had been determined needed to be watched and then I would just go
off and sample things to decide if there was something that maybe could be
watched that we weren't watching. That could take the form of just watching a
network packets on a DC or a client subnet for an hour or so or just walking the
event logs event by event or walking through looking at objects in the
directory. Whatever.
To get into those positions you want to get in with the
companies already mentioned and jump about (and try not to hurt the customer too
much with your learning) or find a big company and take whatever entry position
you can get and prove yourself and grow into bigger/better positions. Don't
expect to, for instance, walk into Walmart and become their AD guy. Maybe you
get in as desktop support and get to know the right people and make suggestions
on how things can be better and work your way up. You could possibly walk into a
company and be there expert right off if your experience is greater than what
they currently have or your resume indicates it or they are desperate. But it
could end up biting you in the end if you don't turn out to be what they
expected. Companies can get mighty pissy if they find out down the road that
they are paying 100k+ to someone who would normally be lucky making $45k.
joe
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas M. Long Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experience I am trying to figure out how one
gauges their AD experience. For example, I have designed, implemented and
maintained an AD/Exchange environment of 5000 users with 1000 workstations from
the ground up, alone. The environment is only 3 sites, with little complexity. I
now work for a company maintaining a directory of about 150 users and 150
workstations. And the more local AD people I talk to, the more confident I am
that I know quite a bit about AD compared to them (only talking about the people
I have met…not generalizing the entire industry). Although I am not a guru like some
on this list, I would like to get myself to the place where I can say “yeah, I
can design your 50,000 user / 15 site infrastructure.” Or is that even possible?
Is a project of that size several directory experts working together?
I honestly believe that I could
perform such a task, but knowing that I would make some mistakes that a VERY
experienced person would not. So, I guess my question
is: How do I get to where I want to be?
Consult? Try to get a job with the biggest company I can?
There may be no real answer, but I
thought it was worth asking because I have been thinking about it for a couple
of months and don’t know where to start to move forward, and this is the only
place I know that has people that I consider AD gurus (or gods
even) |
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experience joe
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... al_maurer
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Lee, Wook
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Hutchins, Mike
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Myrick, Todd \(NIH/CC/DNA\) [E]
- Re: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD ex... Kamlesh Parmar
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Gil Kirkpatrick
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... al_maurer
- RE: [ActiveDir] OT: Gauging AD experi... Rich Milburn
