These days I am much more curious as to the benifits of RAID5? It slows the I/O 
down. It can really crawl if you loose a drive and the server has to rebuild 
the missing volume? 
 
As for multiple partitions, I can't actually see any real advantage on a file 
server. You can easily move the files to any drive and just re-share the 
folders. I guess it does make for an easier wipe and build, but then you may 
have issues with the permissions on the second drive if you get a different SID 
on the re-build.

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Timothy Foster 
        Sent: Thu 18/05/2006 18:28 
        To: [email protected] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
        
        
        Thanks, Brian.  That makes sense.
         
        So if I have a 4 disk array on a single backplane, and given that I 
want the benefits of RAID 5, is there any argument for configuring more than 
one partition on the array?  I realize that this is potentially too much of an 
open-ended question, but I'm curious :-).  The basic premise is that this 
server would be a workhorse domain member/file server.  Would one partition - 
C: - combined with carefully configured share and NTFS permissions provide 
adequate security? Or is it better to put the OS on C: and the shares on D: ?  
Or does the benefit of partitions lie somewhere else - for example, if I wanted 
to wipe C: and reinstall the OS without touching D: ?  (I'm not sure if I like 
this idea, but as I mentioned, I'm curious...).
         
        Thanks,
         
        Tim

  _____  

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian 
Desmond
        Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:53 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice
        
        

        Tim-

         

        It doesn’t really matter. The RAID controller has no idea about the 
partition table. It just presents a LUN to the OS and the OS writes to it.

         

        Thanks,
        Brian Desmond

        [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

         

        c - 312.731.3132

         

         

  _____  

        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy 
Foster
        Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 12:19 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] RAID 5 Best Practice

         

        Using a RAID controller's configuration utility I can build and 
initialize a RAID 5 container.  When installing the OS, I can, if I choose, 
create a partition.  Is this a good or bad idea?  In other words, if I 
partition RAID 5 container during the OS install will it make any difference if 
I ever need to replace a drive and rebuild the array?  Will the partition table 
be recognized during the rebuild?

         

        Thanks for your input.

         

        Tim

         

         



**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. As a public body, the Council may be required to disclose this 
email,  or any response to it,  under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, 
unless the information in it is covered by one of the exemptions in the Act. 

If you receive this email in error please notify Stockport e-Services via 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and then permanently remove it from your system. 

Thank you.

http://www.stockport.gov.uk
**********************************************************************

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to