Could someone please tell me
what all this "Defending Security Infrastructure" stuff is about? Even
though joe said "Do not read about "Defending Security Infrastructure"" on his
blog, I went there and read all about what he wrote about "Defending Security
Infrastructure" because I literally hang off every word joe writes, and he wrote
about "Defending Security Infrastructure" and I wanted to know what his thoughts
were on"Defending Security Infrastructure". But interestingly enough, joe
didn't have much to say about "Defending Security Infrastructure" so I queried
other avenues on "Defending Security Infrastructure" and there sure is a lot on
the subject of "Defending Security Infrastructure" but I couldn't really distill
it. So now I'm going to have to keep watching the joedog blog on "Defending
Security Infrastructure", because if joe talks about "Defending Security
Infrastructure", then "Defending Security Infrastructure" is probably pretty
important.
_____________________________________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Deji Akomolafe
Sent: 12 July, 2006 12:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain ControllersSusan,there are still valid reasons for using hosts file even in an enterprise. I believe that we went through this a couple of months ago.NB: Not to encourage joe or anything like that. I just need to point out that my statement above may be intepreted to imply that hosts files have a role to play in the whole big "Defending Security Infrastructure" realm; for example, if your "Defending Security Infrastructure" service delivery plans does NOT include a robust "split-brain" DNS infrastructure. Of course, a "Defending Security Infrastructure" plan that does not include that is not worth the name "Defending Security Infrastructure plan" at all and does not belong in the "Defending Security Infrastructure" big black ops book.Now I crawl back into my heavily-defended "Defending Security Infrastructure" bunker - or castle - or cave.
Sincerely,
_____
(, / | /) /) /)
/---| (/_ ______ ___// _ // _
) / |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
(_/ /)
(/
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
www.readymaids.com - we know IT
www.akomolafe.com
-5.75, -3.23
Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon
From: Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
Sent: Wed 7/12/2006 8:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain ControllersIn the year 2006.. I hope we are still not making host file entries on servers and workstations.... :-) Peter Johnson wrote: > You might want to then create entries in the host file on the backup > server so that you guarantee that the backup server always uses the > right network connection. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Robert > Rutherford > *Sent:* 12 July 2006 12:57 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers > > > > No issues, if you... > > > > Go to the TCP/IP settings of the backup network card, click advanced, > goto the DNS tab and untick register the connection in DNS. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Rob > > > > > > > > > > *Robert Rutherford* > *QuoStar Solutions Limited* > > > The Enterprise Pavilion > Fern Barrow > Wallisdown > Poole > Dorset > BH12 5HH > > > > > > > > > *T:* > > > > +44 (0) 8456 440 331 > > *F:* > > > > +44 (0) 8456 440 332 > > *M:* > > > > +44 (0) 7974 249 494 > > *E: * > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *W: * > > > > www.quostar.com <http://www.quostar.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > **From:** [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Green > *Sent:* 12 July 2006 11:43 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers > > Hi, > > First posting to this list but I've lurked quite a while and I've > been very impressed by > the quality of replies by the gurus. > > My question is regarding the advisability of having multihomed DCs. > Basically I want > to run backups over a separate GbE and as my servers have dual inbuilt > NICs this > seems an obvious route to take. I know there are some issues with DNS > (I have > a DNS integrated AD). > > Would this cause replication problems, etc ? > > Any other "gotchas" ? > > > > Many Thanks, > > --- > Jeff Green > Network Support Manager > SAPIENS (UK) Ltd > t: +44 (0)1895 464228 f: +44 (0)1895 463098 > > "I dream of hover cars and old transistor radios ... She dreams of > flowers in a field of sunny bungalows" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this email and > document(s) attached are for the exclusive use of the addressee and > may contain confidential, privileged and non-disclosable information. > If the recipient of this email is not the addressee, such recipient is > strictly prohibited from reading, photocopying, distribution or > otherwise using this email or its contents in any way. > > Please notify the Sapiens (UK) Ltd. Systems Administrator via e-mail > immediately at [EMAIL PROTECTED], if you have received this > email in error. > > Disclaimer: The views, opinions and guidelines contained in this > confidential e-mail are those of the originating author and may not be > representative of Sapiens (UK) Ltd. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will hunt you down... http://blogs.technet.com/sbs List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
