RE: [OT]Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers

[Kurt Falde]

Great so we can have even more people taking confidential data home with them and getting their laptops stolen from their cars J  Until we get Vista BitLocker and laptops that utilize it across the board I would be extremely paranoid about laptops all over.   Kurt Falde From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al Mulnick Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 5:06 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [OT]Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers   I know we're drifting off-topic, but I read this and started thinking: laptops.  Why bother with desktops?   On 7/12/06, Matt Hargraves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not so sure I agree with that.  Thin clients work just fine, require less maintenance and can be replaced in 5 minutes, vs. the 3 hour argument that you'll get if you try replacing someone's desktop because they saved 190000 items that have nothing to do with their job on the local hard drive. Then again, desktops are about as expensive nowadays as thin clients, so the justification for thin clients isn't what it used to be.