Not so sure I agree with that. Thin clients work just fine, require less maintenance and can be replaced in 5 minutes, vs. the 3 hour argument that you'll get if you try replacing someone's desktop because they saved 190000 items that have nothing to do with their job on the local hard drive.
Then again, desktops are about as expensive nowadays as thin clients, so the justification for thin clients isn't what it used to be.
- Re: [ActiveDir] Multih... Paul Williams
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed ... Robert Rutherford
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed ... Robert Rutherford
- Re: [ActiveDir] Multih... Al Mulnick
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed ... Kevin Brunson
- Re: [ActiveDir] Multih... Matt Hargraves
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed ... Kevin Brunson
- Re: [ActiveDir] Multih... Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multih... Ken Schaefer
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed ... Kevin Brunson
- Re: [ActiveDir] Multih... Matt Hargraves
- [OT]Re: [ActiveDir... Al Mulnick
- RE: [OT]Re: [A... Kurt Falde
- Re: [OT]Re... Al Mulnick
- Re: [... Matt Hargraves
- Re: [ActiveDir] Mu... AFidel
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multih... Brian Desmond
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed ... Kevin Brunson
- RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed ... Freddy HARTONO
- Re: [ActiveDir] Multih... Al Mulnick
- RE: [ActiveDir] Mu... Brian Desmond
