RE: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers

[Kevin Brunson]

Sorry, forgive me for my lack of clarity.   I was on the phone with Microsoft when I wrote that, so my head was shrinking….  But don’t worry, they refunded my case.   I agree with you 100%.  My rant was purely referring to the desktop published app, not a physical workstation.  I was ranting about admins who can’t seem to understand that citrix costs more than rdp, but that is about the only difference if every user is connecting to the citrix desktop instead of published apps.  Especially since they don’t want to lock the users down on the citrix servers.    Wow, it’s a long way from multihomed domain controllers to Citrix and desktops vs. thin clients.       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Hargraves Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:46 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Multihomed Domain Controllers   Not so sure I agree with that.  Thin clients work just fine, require less maintenance and can be replaced in 5 minutes, vs. the 3 hour argument that you'll get if you try replacing someone's desktop because they saved 190000 items that have nothing to do with their job on the local hard drive. Then again, desktops are about as expensive nowadays as thin clients, so the justification for thin clients isn't what it used to be.