There are many advantages for Exchange 2003, especially in
backend I/O performance.
There are feature improvements/additions, like OWA 2003 and
RPC over HTTP.
The replacement for IM in Exchange 2000 is Live
Communications Server 2005 - an Outlook environment with Office Communicator and
LCS 2005 is a much better experience than Exchange 2000 IM, in my
opinion...
--James
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ajay Kumar
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 7:36 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Why we go for exchange 2003 server
Hi,
Can any one pls tell me why I should implement exchange 2003
enterprise server instead of 2000 enterprise
server In my organization.
Becoz Exchange 2000 having Messenging serivces but
2003 doesn't have.
Actually My main intention is why I go for 2003 exchagne server.
Pls suggest me.
Regards,
Ajay pardeshi
