Well right off, you would get used to a feature that is no longer in the product which would be silly.
 
Second off Exchange 2000 is already outside of mainstream support. This means no non-security hotfixes unless you want to pay for them and trust me, you don't want to pay for them, it isn't like $50 gets you a hot fix. You could be talking hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars.
 
You don't get any of the huge number of fixes in the Exchange architecture that have been put into 2003, all of the things they found broken in 2K that never got fixed there.
 
Exchange 12 aka Exchange 2007 should be out in the next quarter or so, last I heard it was actually end of November, so you would then be at N-2 which is generally a bad place to be.
 
  joe
 
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm 
 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ajay Kumar
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 8:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ActiveDir] Why we go for exchange 2003 server

Hi,
 
Can any one pls tell me why I should implement exchange 2003 enterprise server instead of 2000 enterprise server In my organization.
Becoz Exchange 2000 having Messenging serivces but 2003 doesn't have.
Actually My main intention is why I go for 2003 exchagne server.
Pls suggest me.
 
 
Regards,
Ajay pardeshi
 

Reply via email to