Sonicwall vs. ISA?

That's a new one on me.  I'm not a SBSer, but I do have a Sonicwall.
Would you care to expand?

thank you

----- Original Message ----- From: "Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] OT: M$


(I would just like to go on record as saying that I thought Brett's post was funny)

In the MVP survey this year the final question was "give three words that best describe Microsoft?" Boy howdy was that the hardest part of the survey to fill out. Three words to describe the "company"? Youch. Think about that one for a moment will ya? Ask me to say three words about the people of Microsoft and I'd have that survey done in a nanosecond. Ask me three words about the "Company" ...this financial entity that files 10Ks and like what do you want me to say? Microsoft (or M$ or MF$T whatever you'd like to call it) is a company registered with the SEC to do business. It is a software company. It is an entity. It has a Tax ID number. It has to make sucky decisions due to Judges and Lawyers and Patents and EU attorneys and stupid EOLA lawsuits and .........

The Employees of Microsoft (no abbreviations)... as was best put by a Security MVP.... he went looking for the employees of Microsoft that eat babies....you know...the ones he's heard about in those Department of Justice/SlashDot postings and all that.... well he can't find them. Every one of them he (and I) have ever met are sincere, hardworking, trustworthy people. In fact that's one of the wonderful things about the blogs... they do a total 'end run' around WagEd/PR stuff and show the people for the people. Even when Brett didn't blog.... we knew about him via his blog. Just honest people talking to people. And that's when Microsoft truly rocks.

I also know that in the newsgroups when I have someone who challenges my views I find that ends up happening is not that I'll change them, but I'll solidify my views. To those that use M$ knowing full well that it annoys you (the generic you, not "you", you), if their goal is to annoy....they won't change.

The following items are bound to start arguments/flames etc. in my home base community (most of these are specific to SBS, so my apologies)

1.  One nic versus two
2. Antivirus choice (with the exception of Norton Yellow Box consumer which is nearly universally hated by all in IT)
3.  Sonicwall versus ISA server
4.  .local/.lan versus .com
5.  the lack of inclusion of DFSv2 in SBS 2003 R2

So I guess if you are doing a list of Arguments/Flamewars in this community I guess I will say
1.  The use or non use of M$  :-)

Sometimes you just have to let it roll off your back.  :-)

How about a lighter less argumentative topic change: So how about those USA elections, 'eh? What's your thoughts about Stem Cell Research?

Laura A. Robinson wrote:
Disclaimer #1: "You" in the below refers to a generic "you", not a specific person. Disclaimer #2: My opinions are in no way intended to represent those of my employer. They're my own, and they were my opinions long before I became a Microsoft employee.
That said...
You know what I find amazing here? It has been clearly expressed that there *are* people who find the term irritating (and I assure you, I'm not the only one; I'm just the only one who states it publicly), yet you're still arguing that because *you* think it's funny, it's therefore okay to use it. Please explain this logic to me. If you meet somebody who asks you not to call him "Tiny" because he hates the nickname, do you make a point to call him "Tiny"? If you do, then you have some serious personal issues. If you don't do that, then why do you think it's okay to continue to justify using a name on a Microsoft-centric list that is populated by Microsoft-centric people that you've been told *is* offensive to some of those people? This isn't about political correctness and it isn't about different senses of humor. It's about somebody having stated flat-out that the "M$" term is offensive to her (and, again, to a lot more people than you realize) and you continuing to assert that it's just fine for you to use it. Some people might consider that incredibly childish and ignorant. Did it never occur to you simply to not use or defend the use of the term, regardless of whether you think I'm oversensitive about it? It certainly occurred to the person who originally posted it to stop using the term, and he didn't have to have an argument that boils down to "I think it's funny, so you need to just get over it" before stating that he wouldn't continue to use the term. I found that very adult of him. I don't, however, find it particularly adult to continue to defend the use of a tasteless, inaccurate, slighting moniker because *you* think it's "funny". Most Microsoft employees are not nearly as well-paid as the public seems to think, and yet, the VAST majority of them contribute their own time and money to charitable organizations. I can give you statistics if you like; Microsoft is actually first in terms of per-capita employee philanthropy. The insistence upon referring to the company as "M$" displays a tremendous amount of ignorance and rudeness to those employees, IMO.
 Laura

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Bahta,
    Nathaniel V CTR USAF NASIC/SCNA
    *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2006 8:44 AM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$

    Exactly, is exactly right.  You cant impose your own humor
    preferences on someone because you consider it unfunny.  You just
    dont laugh.  You can't stop bad jokes, because someone, somewhere
    is laughing at them.  Just not you.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Laura
    A. Robinson
    *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2006 8:20 AM
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$

    Exactly. M$ just isn't funny. Borg, kool-aid, those are funny. M$
    isn't. Go figure.

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
        *Bahta, Nathaniel V CTR USAF NASIC/SCNA
        *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2006 7:46 AM
        *To:* [email protected]
        *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$

        Useless Air Farce would not be found funny because its just
        that, not funny.  Funnier is US Chair Force.  Thats funny, and
        people here laugh at it all the time.

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------
        *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
        *Robert Rutherford
        *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2006 7:32 AM
        *To:* [email protected]
        *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$

        ;oP


        Rob

        Robert Rutherford
        QuoStar Solutions Limited

T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        W:    www.quostar.com

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
        *Laura A. Robinson
        *Sent:* 13 November 2006 12:16
        *To:* [email protected]
        *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$


        There's a reason for the "OT" portion of the subject line, you
        know. ;-)


        Laura


            
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
            *Robert Rutherford
            *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2006 6:42 AM
            *To:* [email protected]
            *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$

            Can we kill this thread now, please?


            Rob

            Robert Rutherford
            QuoStar Solutions Limited

T: +44 (0) 8456 440 331 F: +44 (0) 8456 440 332 M: +44 (0) 7974 249 494 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            W:    www.quostar.com

            
------------------------------------------------------------------------

            *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
            *Laura A. Robinson
            *Sent:* 13 November 2006 11:31
            *To:* [email protected]
            *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$


            Clearly there are differing opinions about whether it's
            merely "slang" or whether it's an inappropriate slur.
            Simpler just not to use it, don't you think? I mean, I
            don't refer to the USAF as the "useless air farce" and
            expect its members to think that's funny.


            I don't take offense when people refer to Microsoft as
            "borg" or talk about "drinking the Kool-Aid"; in fact, I
            have been known to reference both myself. However, I
            remember the origin of "M$" (unlike, I suspect, some of
            those who use the phrase and think it's funny), and I
            think it's ignorant and inappropriate for people to use it
            on a Microsoft-centric list.


            Laura


                
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf
                Of *Bahta, Nathaniel V CTR USAF NASIC/SCNA
                *Sent:* Monday, November 13, 2006 5:48 AM
                *To:* [email protected]
                *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$

                You have to be able to laugh at yourself.  M$ is a
                tounge in cheek expression and certainly a corporation
                like Microsoft can laugh at itself when M$ is used as
                slang in its reference.  Thats why we nickname really
                big guys tiny.


                
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf
                Of *Albert Duro
                *Sent:* Sunday, November 12, 2006 10:27 PM
                *To:* [email protected]
                *Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] OT: M$

                being conciliatory is laudable, but I think you're
                missing the point.  It's not wether anybody is
                offended or not -- the question is why does someone
come into a peaceful gathering casting offense. Especially when it's not necessary. If someone
                deliberately spits on the dinner table, do you say
                'oh, well, he didn't hit any plate, let's just forget
                it' ?  or even worse, 'he hit someone else's plate --
                no worries.'


                ----- Original Message -----

                    *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

                    *To:* [email protected]
                    <mailto:[email protected]>

                    *Sent:* Friday, November 10, 2006 9:08 AM

                    *Subject:* RE: [ActiveDir] OT: M$


                    I highly doubt that any MS employee takes offence
                    at what is surely as tongue in cheek expression.


                    Let's not get _too_ PC please :/


                    neil

                        -----Original Message-----
                        *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                        Behalf Of *Laura A. Robinson
                        *Sent:* Thursday, November 09, 2006 6:14 PM
                        *To:* [email protected]
                        <mailto:[email protected]>
                        *Subject:* [ActiveDir] OT: M$

                        Just out of curiosity, what makes people think
                        it's appropriate to refer to Microsoft as "M$"
                        on an MS-focused mailing list whose
                        participants include Microsoft employees,
                        Microsoft contractors, Microsoft MVPs and
                        various other people who may have a relatively
                        positive view of Microsoft?


                        Laura


                            
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                            [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                            *On Behalf Of *Jitendra Kalyankar
                            *Sent:* Thursday, November 09, 2006 10:16 AM
                            *To:* [email protected]
                            *Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] Beginner's Book
                            on Scripting - WSH or VBScript?

                            This is the link to M$ to start
                            with...very good info....



http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnanchor/html/scriptinga.asp



-- Sincerely,
                            J


                            On 11/9/06, *Stu Packett*
                            <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                            <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

                            Hello everyone.  After reading through a
                            lot of the posts on this mailing list, I
                            realize I could make my job easier if I
                            knew how to script.  I have no experience
                            in scripting, but would like to know what
                            books do you recommend as a beginner's
                            book on scripting?  Also, I don't really
                            know the difference between WSH and
                            VBScript, so if anyone could explain that,
                            I'd appreciate that.  After browsing
                            through Amazon, I saw several books on WSH
                            and VBScript, but don't know where I
                            should focus on.  I'm also open to
                            computer based training (CBT) videos of
                            any exist.  Thanks in advance.



                    PLEASE READ: The information contained in this
                    email is confidential and

                    intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you
                    are not an intended

                    recipient of this email please notify the sender
                    immediately and delete your

                    copy from your system. You must not copy,
                    distribute or take any further

                    action in reliance on it. Email is not a secure
                    method of communication and

                    Nomura International plc ('NIplc') will not, to
                    the extent permitted by law,

                    accept responsibility or liability for (a) the
                    accuracy or completeness of,

                    or (b) the presence of any virus, worm or similar
                    malicious or disabling

                    code in, this message or any attachment(s) to it.
                    If verification of this

                    email is sought then please request a hard copy.
                    Unless otherwise stated

                    this email: (1) is not, and should not be treated
                    or relied upon as,

                    investment research; (2) contains views or
                    opinions that are solely those of

                    the author and do not necessarily represent those
                    of NIplc; (3) is intended

                    for informational purposes only and is not a
                    recommendation, solicitation or

                    offer to buy or sell securities or related
                    financial instruments. NIplc

                    does not provide investment services to private
                    customers. Authorised and

                    regulated by the Financial Services Authority.
                    Registered in England

                    no. 1550505 VAT No. 447 2492 35. Registered
                    Office: 1 St Martin's-le-Grand,

                    London, EC1A 4NP. A member of the Nomura group of
                    companies.


--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days? http://www.threatcode.com

If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... man ... I will hunt you down...
http://blogs.technet.com/sbs

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/


List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to