Please tell me that you're making that up. Otherwise I'll have to stab
myself in the eye with a fork. "My Business"???? 

Words fail me. :-)

Laura
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:13 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] _msdcs not propagated in AXFR
> 
> We install the Kitchen Sink service too don't forget....  ;-)
> 
> (wait until we start talking about the My Business 
> OU...that's usually good for another freak out or two)
> 
> Laura A. Robinson wrote:
> > Small point- dcpromo creates those zones as mentioned in 
> the original 
> > question  *if* you have not configured DNS beforehand, *if* 
> you tell 
> > dcpromo to go ahead and do it for you, and *if* you're building the 
> > forest root domain. If you have configured DNS beforehand, how the 
> > zones get created (as stub zones, as subdomains, etc.) will 
> depend on 
> > that preconfiguration. If you're not building the forest 
> root domain, 
> > the subdomain already exists and dcpromo is just populating it.
> >
> > I bring this up only because there are many companies that have 
> > existing DNS infrastructures and it's important to know 
> that "default" 
> > is not equivalent to "mandatory". It is not a requirement that the 
> > _msdcs zone be either a separate zone or a subdomain in an existing 
> > zone, whether it's a stub or a full zone, etc.
> >
> > Of course, since we're talking SBS, all of this goes out the window 
> > (no pun intended). SBS is its own freaky little animal.
> >
> > Laura
> >
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hans 
> >> Halbmayr
> >> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 1:06 PM
> >> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> >> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] _msdcs not propagated in AXFR
> >>
> >> Usually dcpromo creates all these zones. Windows creates 
> these zones 
> >> in a forest partition. If you have a linux DNS server just create 
> >> another slave zone of _msdcs.example.com.
> >> The gray one is only the delegation. 
> >>
> >> Hans
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----
> >> From: Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2006 5:39:26 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] _msdcs not propagated in AXFR
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok, so basically _msdcs is just a separate zone. Do Windows DNS 
> >> setups usually do this? I'm using SBS.
> >>
> >> I have a bind DNS server running on a linux machine with a 
> slave zone 
> >> for example.com. The AXFR doesn't have those records 
> (aside from the 
> >> NS record). So what you're saying is that I need to setup another 
> >> slave zone for the _msdcs subdomain?
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >> On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 03:02:22 -0800 (PST) Hans Halbmayr 
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>     
> >>> Hi Mike,
> >>>
> >>> the gray one is the delegation of the zone. The _msdcs ist
> >>>       
> >> a subdomain of your forest root. Because it is needed all over the 
> >> forest it is delegated.
> >>     
> >>> Regards
> >>> Hans
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message ----
> >>> From: Michael B Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> >>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Sent: Saturday, December 2, 2006 12:15:29 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] _msdcs not propagated in AXFR
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure I understand. In DNS admin I see two zones. One for 
> >>> _msdcs.example.com with all the usual _msdcs records and one for 
> >>> example.com which incedentally has an NS record for 
> >>> _msdcs.example.com. The little folder thingy for this
> >>>       
> >> _msdcs is grey
> >>     
> >>> which I guess signifies that it's some kind of link to the
> >>>       
> >> other zone?
> >>     
> >>> So I understand why the _msdcs records other than the one 
> NS record 
> >>> are not transferring but I don't understand why the
> >>>       
> >> structure is split
> >>     
> >>> into two zones and if I can/should do something about it.
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:27:14 -0800
> >>> "Akomolafe, Deji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>       
> >>>> Seen this? http://support.microsoft.com/kb/817470
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Sincerely, 
> >>>>    _____                                
> >>>>   (, /  |  /)               /)     /)   
> >>>>     /---| (/_  ______   ___// _   //  _ 
> >>>>  ) /    |_/(__(_) // (_(_)(/_(_(_/(__(/_
> >>>> (_/                             /)      
> >>>>                                (/       
> >>>> Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
> >>>> www.akomolafe.com - we know IT
> >>>> -5.75, -3.23
> >>>> Do you now realize that Today is the Tomorrow you were
> >>>>         
> >> worried about
> >>     
> >>>> Yesterday? -anon
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Michael B Allen
> >>>> Sent: Fri 12/1/2006 9:40 AM
> >>>> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> >>>> Subject: [ActiveDir] _msdcs not propagated in AXFR
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Does anyone know why the _msdcs records are not returned
> >>>>         
> >> in an AXFR
> >>     
> >>>> DNS query? This means that slave zones will not have
> >>>>         
> >> those records
> >>     
> >>>> and that software querying for a domain controller may
> >>>>         
> >> not find one.
> >>     
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Michael B Allen
> >>>> PHP Active Directory SSO
> >>>> http://www.ioplex.com/
> >>>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> >>>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> >>>> List archive: 
> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
> >>>>
> >>>>         
> >>> --
> >>> Michael B Allen
> >>> PHP Active Directory SSO
> >>> http://www.ioplex.com/
> >>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> >>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> >>> List archive: 
> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> >> _
> >>     
> >>> ______________
> >>> Do you Yahoo!?
> >>> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> >>> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> >>> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> >>> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> >>> List archive: 
> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> --
> >> Michael B Allen
> >> PHP Active Directory SSO
> >> http://www.ioplex.com/
> >> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> >> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> >> List archive: 
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
> >>
> >>
> >>  
> >> ______________________________________________________________
> >> ______________________
> >> Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
> >> Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com
> >> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> >> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> >> List archive: 
> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> >> Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.6/567 - Release
> >> Date: 12/4/2006 7:18 AM
> >>  
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >   
> 
> --
> Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?  
> http://www.threatcode.com
> 
> If you are a SBSer and you don't subscribe to the SBS Blog... 
> man ... I will hunt you down...
> http://blogs.technet.com/sbs
> 
> List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
> List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
> List archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.6/567 - Release 
> Date: 12/4/2006 7:18 AM
>  
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.15.6/567 - Release Date: 12/4/2006
7:18 AM
 

List info   : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx
List FAQ    : http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir@mail.activedir.org/

Reply via email to