Hello Jeff,
Technically everything can be decompiled, even C. I guess the difference
is that you need the super crackers to read assembly, while half-baked
crackers can actually have a shot at reversed intermediate code (ie.
Java, C#, Flash). pp is excellent as a free .exe compiler, but it will
really not give the product developer a good sleep.
Give us the spiel on how PerlApp makes the difference Jeff!
Jeff Griffiths wrote:
Foo Ji-Haw wrote:
I think I understand why the guys from ActiveState don't answer these
questions.
I think they have not woken up yet. Anyway the question has been
asked so many times you can actually Goggle the answer.
We're awake! Well, I am, Gisle is for sure because he's in Norway, but
perhaps Jan isn't yet ( or maybe he's snowboarding today ).
As for the rest of the content in this thread, my only comment is that
it is possible to de-compile most things, even C++:
http://www.codeproject.com/cpp/reversedisasm.asp
Currently I would say we're ahead of the game in that I know of no
published cracking methods for PerlApp'd code. I don't read Russian
though. =)
cheers, JeffG
_______________________________________________
ActivePerl mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: http://listserv.ActiveState.com/mailman/mysubs
