On Miércoles, 29 de Julio de 2009 06:36:14 Courtland escribió: > Properly namespacing the route resources as you suggested seems to fix > the delete problem. Thanks a bunch. > > Is this to say that active_scaffold has moved away from supporting the > old school default routes and will only work when using RESTful > routes? The wiki on github still implies that this is optional. I > would just like to understand what the correct approach is and why, as > I have been using active_scaffold without the additional route > resources for some time now, and I have quite a few models/scaffolds > in my application.
I think it was optional because RESTful routes was added later to rails, and we had support for old rails versions. However, latest branches only support new rails versions, and default routes are not recommended. It's harder support old default routes and RESTful routes, and we are thinking to move nested scaffolds to use nested routes, so I don't think we support default routes in a future (or even currently). > > On Jul 17, 5:34 pm, David Cato <[email protected]> wrote: > > Courtland wrote ... > > > > > The generateddeleteURL is. > > > > > >http://localhost:3000/admin/scaffolds/users/delete/64?_method=delete&;... > > > > > > This does look like a routing problem of sorts. I did not have the > > > "map.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true" in my routes, but > > > adding such does not change the resulting URL nor does it resolve the > > > exception. > > > > Since you've namespaced your controller, you need to namespace the route > > too. One possibility would be > > > > map.namespace(:admin) do |admin| > > admin.namespace(:scaffold) do |scaffold| > > scaffold.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true > > ... > > end > > end > > > > I've never tried a two-level namespace before so there might be a > > simpler way to specify the routes, but I couldn't come up with anything > > else that worked. > > > > > Here are my routes. > > > > > > ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map| > > > > > > map.root :controller => 'redirector', :action => 'index' > > > > > > map.resources :users > > > map.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true > > > > These would be for the top-level users controller, probably for things > > like account signup and such. Since your admin controller is namespaced, > > you need to remove, at least, the one with :active_scaffold => true. > > > > > map.resources :admins > > > map.resource :admin_session, :controller => '/admin/sessions' > > > > > > map.connect '/admin', :controller => '/admin/menu', :action => > > > 'instruments' > > > > > > map.connect ':controller/:action/:id.:format' > > > map.connect ':controller/:action/:id' > > > > Unless you have a really good reason for keeping these last two > > old-style default routes, you're better off removing them and sticking > > with RESTful and named routes only. > > > > > map.connect '*anything', :controller => 'redirector', :action => > > > 'index' > > > > > > end > > > > From my working routes.rb with a single-level admin namespace, leaving > > out the unrelated routes, > > > > ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map| > > # For the public side (user signup, password change, etc.) > > map.resources :users, :member => { :change_password => :get, > > :update_password => :put } > > > > # For the admin side > > map.namespace(:admin) do |admin| > > admin.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true > > end > > end > > -- Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
