FYI more discussion and followup "fix" here... http://github.com/activescaffold/active_scaffold/issues/closed/#issue/40
On Jul 29, 9:27 am, Courtland <[email protected]> wrote: > Good to know thanks. > > On Jul 29, 8:57 am, "Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::." > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Miércoles, 29 de Julio de 2009 06:36:14 Courtland escribió: > > > > Properly namespacing the route resources as you suggested seems to fix > > > the delete problem. Thanks a bunch. > > > > Is this to say that active_scaffold has moved away from supporting the > > > old school default routes and will only work when usingRESTful > > > routes? The wiki on github still implies that this is optional. I > > > would just like to understand what the correct approach is and why, as > > > I have been using active_scaffold without the additional route > > > resources for some time now, and I have quite a few models/scaffolds > > > in my application. > > > I think it was optional becauseRESTfulroutes was added later to rails, and > > we had support for old rails versions. However, latest branches only support > > new rails versions, and default routes are not recommended. It's harder > > support old default routes andRESTfulroutes, and we are thinking to move > > nested scaffolds to use nested routes, so I don't think we support default > > routes in a future (or even currently). > > > > On Jul 17, 5:34 pm, David Cato <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Courtland wrote ... > > > > > > The generateddeleteURL is. > > > > > >http://localhost:3000/admin/scaffolds/users/delete/64?_method=delete&... > > > > > > This does look like a routing problem of sorts. I did not have the > > > > > "map.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true" in my routes, but > > > > > adding such does not change the resulting URL nor does it resolve the > > > > > exception. > > > > > Since you've namespaced your controller, you need to namespace the route > > > > too. One possibility would be > > > > > map.namespace(:admin) do |admin| > > > > admin.namespace(:scaffold) do |scaffold| > > > > scaffold.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true > > > > ... > > > > end > > > > end > > > > > I've never tried a two-level namespace before so there might be a > > > > simpler way to specify the routes, but I couldn't come up with anything > > > > else that worked. > > > > > > Here are my routes. > > > > > > ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map| > > > > > > map.root :controller => 'redirector', :action => 'index' > > > > > > map.resources :users > > > > > map.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true > > > > > These would be for the top-level users controller, probably for things > > > > like account signup and such. Since your admin controller is namespaced, > > > > you need to remove, at least, the one with :active_scaffold => true. > > > > > > map.resources :admins > > > > > map.resource :admin_session, :controller => '/admin/sessions' > > > > > > map.connect '/admin', :controller => '/admin/menu', :action => > > > > > 'instruments' > > > > > > map.connect ':controller/:action/:id.:format' > > > > > map.connect ':controller/:action/:id' > > > > > Unless you have a really good reason for keeping these last two > > > > old-style default routes, you're better off removing them and sticking > > > > withRESTfuland named routes only. > > > > > > map.connect '*anything', :controller => 'redirector', :action => > > > > > 'index' > > > > > > end > > > > > From my working routes.rb with a single-level admin namespace, leaving > > > > out the unrelated routes, > > > > > ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map| > > > > # For the public side (user signup, password change, etc.) > > > > map.resources :users, :member => { :change_password => :get, > > > > :update_password => :put } > > > > > # For the admin side > > > > map.namespace(:admin) do |admin| > > > > admin.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true > > > > end > > > > end > > > -- > > Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::. > > Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza > > T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
