Good to know thanks.
On Jul 29, 8:57 am, "Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::."
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Miércoles, 29 de Julio de 2009 06:36:14 Courtland escribió:
>
> > Properly namespacing the route resources as you suggested seems to fix
> > the delete problem. Thanks a bunch.
>
> > Is this to say that active_scaffold has moved away from supporting the
> > old school default routes and will only work when using RESTful
> > routes? The wiki on github still implies that this is optional. I
> > would just like to understand what the correct approach is and why, as
> > I have been using active_scaffold without the additional route
> > resources for some time now, and I have quite a few models/scaffolds
> > in my application.
>
> I think it was optional because RESTful routes was added later to rails, and
> we had support for old rails versions. However, latest branches only support
> new rails versions, and default routes are not recommended. It's harder
> support old default routes and RESTful routes, and we are thinking to move
> nested scaffolds to use nested routes, so I don't think we support default
> routes in a future (or even currently).
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 17, 5:34 pm, David Cato <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Courtland wrote ...
>
> > > > The generateddeleteURL is.
>
> > > >http://localhost:3000/admin/scaffolds/users/delete/64?_method=delete&;...
>
> > > > This does look like a routing problem of sorts. I did not have the
> > > > "map.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true" in my routes, but
> > > > adding such does not change the resulting URL nor does it resolve the
> > > > exception.
>
> > > Since you've namespaced your controller, you need to namespace the route
> > > too. One possibility would be
>
> > > map.namespace(:admin) do |admin|
> > > admin.namespace(:scaffold) do |scaffold|
> > > scaffold.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true
> > > ...
> > > end
> > > end
>
> > > I've never tried a two-level namespace before so there might be a
> > > simpler way to specify the routes, but I couldn't come up with anything
> > > else that worked.
>
> > > > Here are my routes.
>
> > > > ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map|
>
> > > > map.root :controller => 'redirector', :action => 'index'
>
> > > > map.resources :users
> > > > map.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true
>
> > > These would be for the top-level users controller, probably for things
> > > like account signup and such. Since your admin controller is namespaced,
> > > you need to remove, at least, the one with :active_scaffold => true.
>
> > > > map.resources :admins
> > > > map.resource :admin_session, :controller => '/admin/sessions'
>
> > > > map.connect '/admin', :controller => '/admin/menu', :action =>
> > > > 'instruments'
>
> > > > map.connect ':controller/:action/:id.:format'
> > > > map.connect ':controller/:action/:id'
>
> > > Unless you have a really good reason for keeping these last two
> > > old-style default routes, you're better off removing them and sticking
> > > with RESTful and named routes only.
>
> > > > map.connect '*anything', :controller => 'redirector', :action =>
> > > > 'index'
>
> > > > end
>
> > > From my working routes.rb with a single-level admin namespace, leaving
> > > out the unrelated routes,
>
> > > ActionController::Routing::Routes.draw do |map|
> > > # For the public side (user signup, password change, etc.)
> > > map.resources :users, :member => { :change_password => :get,
> > > :update_password => :put }
>
> > > # For the admin side
> > > map.namespace(:admin) do |admin|
> > > admin.resources :users, :active_scaffold => true
> > > end
> > > end
>
> --
> Sergio Cambra .:: entreCables S.L. ::.
> Mariana Pineda 23, 50.018 Zaragoza
> T) 902 021 404 F) 976 52 98 07 E) [email protected]
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ActiveScaffold : Ruby on Rails plugin" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/activescaffold?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
