WOW!
This is the most complete list of performance metrics for policy development I 
have ever seen.

Michele,
Would you please share with me information about Kaizen events (specifically 
about policy development, if you are aware of any), such as web sites or 
anything else I might need to know to find one?

Thank you

Mary Keenan

From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michele Gross
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 6:18 AM
To: Institutional policy-related discussions
Subject: Re: [acupa-l] performance metrics

Good morning Jack,
I've not completed a Kaizen event on policy development yet (only on hiring of 
employees) but that would be a good idea.  If I were determining what to 
measure in the policy process, I'd be looking at:
NEW
1) Full cycle (from conception to publishing in the policy library)
2) Length of time it takes for the policy owner from determining a policy is 
needed to creating a policy draft (in the template).
3) Days to complete consultation of policy draft with key stakeholders (this 
gets fairly long if trying to get on an agenda with our Faculty Senate for 
example)
4) Days from the point that the policy enters the formal review cycle (in my 
situation, it would be when they turn the policy over to me to prep for the 
Policy Advisory Committee) until a decision is made by the PPC
5) Days to post the policy for 30-day review
6) Days to modify the policy based on comments received
7) Days to publish the policy after final draft is received
I could also measure # of days it took to obtain a response to a question 
submitted via our policy feedback mechanism.
There would be some variation of the measurements above if completing a 
required comprehensive review.

1) Full cycle (from notification that a comp review is required to publishing 
in the policy library)
2) Time to provide materials to the policy owner (my office)
3) Time to gather input on the existing policy (from our data, their help line, 
through customer contacts, etc.) which would be used to identify issues with 
current draft
4) Time for management consideration of changes to their policy and associated 
documents (in my organization, there is a heavy emphasis on reducing burden).  
This would be the time to look at thresholds, number of required approvals, 
policy scope, etc.
5) Days to modify the policy draft with the information from #3 and #4 above.
6) Days to complete consultation of revised policy with key stakeholders (this 
gets fairly long if trying to get on an agenda with our Faculty Senate for 
example)
7) Days from the point that the policy enters the formal review cycle (in my 
situation, it would be when they turn the policy over to me to prep for the 
Policy Advisory Committee) until a decision is made by the PPC
8) Days to post the revised policy for 30-day review
9) Days to modify the policy based on comments received
10) Days to publish the policy after final draft is received

I hope this was the type of response you were looking for.
Good luck!
Michele

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Zeigler, Jack E. (DES) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello All,

We are heavily involved in developing a LEAN culture.  A key element of LEAN is 
selecting  process metrics to report project results.

I am looking for help in choosing appropriate metrics for policy development, 
maintenance and management.   Examples, guidance,  tutorials, etc.   All would 
be welcome.

Regards,

Jack Zeigler  •  DES Policy and Rules Manager  •  Legal Services Office  •   
360.407.9209<tel:360.407.9209>
Washington Department of Enterprise Services  •  1500 Jefferson Street SE, 
Olympia, WA  98504-1410


ATTN: Please be aware that when you respond to an ACUPA-L e-mail, the reply 
will be distributed to the ENTIRE e-listing of members. If you do NOT want to 
send an e-mail to everyone, please reply directly to the individual who 
initiated the query (their e-mail address appears in the "From" line of their 
original e-mail).

If you wish to remove yourself from the ACUPA e-mail list, please go to this 
web address and fill out the form. We will remove you from the list within 24 
hours during normal business hours.

http://www.acupa.org/MembershipForm_Discontinue.html



--
Michele Gross, Director
University Policy Program
University of Minnesota
356-1 McNamara, 200 Oak street
Minneapolis, MN  55454
612-624-8081

http://policy.umn.edu/

ATTN: Please be aware that when you respond to an ACUPA-L e-mail, the reply 
will be distributed to the ENTIRE e-listing of members. If you do NOT want to 
send an e-mail to everyone, please reply directly to the individual who 
initiated the query (their e-mail address appears in the "From" line of their 
original e-mail).

If you wish to remove yourself from the ACUPA e-mail list, please go to this 
web address and fill out the form. We will remove you from the list within 24 
hours during normal business hours.

http://www.acupa.org/MembershipForm_Discontinue.html

Reply via email to