> On 16 Jan 2018, at 11:11, Malcolm Hutty <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's because I don't think that "rough consensus" is primarily about > how many supporters a proposal has, I think it's about primarily about > the nature and quality of the objection.
Indeed. And how those objections were considered/addressed/resolved. > this can only be a discussion of principles and norms, it can never be turned > into a rigid > set of rules. This model will always rest heavily on the judgment of the > Chairs. I'm OK with that. Me too.
