Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New Policy Proposal (Reducing IPv4 Allocations to a /24)

[Jim Reid]

> On 4 Feb 2019, at 13:58, Daniel Karrenberg <d...@ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> The question before us is: What is the minimum useful allocation?

Well yes Daniel.

But how long does that discussion last? Perhaps 5-10 years from now we’ll be 
debating policies on how the NCC allocates /30s or /31s of v4. :-)

Even if the NCC is left with fragments of v4, it may well be impractical to 
allocate them. Kind of like how the final reserves in a mine or an oil well get 
left in the ground because it’s not financially viable to extract them.