> On 4 Feb 2019, at 14:20, [email protected] wrote: > >> But how long does that discussion last? Perhaps 5-10 years from now we’ll be >> debating policies on how the NCC allocates /30s or /31s of v4. :-) > > No, because (hopefully) the prefix filters on the v4 Internet will never EVER > allow anything smaller than a /24 to be routed on the open Internet ... That may well be true Garry. But just think of all the fine dinners and exotic travel that can be had as we talk and talk and talk about IPv4 allocation policy for ever more useless allocation units of ever smaller amounts of v4 space at the NCC. We can't allow reality to intrude on those sorts of policy discussions. :-)
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 201... Francis Brosnan Blázquez
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Jim Reid
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Sander Steffann
- Re: [address-policy... Jim Reid
- Re: [address-p... Sander Steffann
- Re: [address-p... Daniel Karrenberg
- Re: [addre... Sander Steffann
- Re: [addre... Daniel Karrenberg
- Re: [addre... Jim Reid
- Re: [addre... garry
- Re: [addre... Jim Reid
- Re: [addre... Randy Bush
- Re: [address-p... Tore Anderson
- Re: [addre... garry
- Re: [addre... Peter Hessler
- Re: [addre... Tore Anderson
- Re: [addre... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg]... Daniel Suchy
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02 New ... Jetten Raymond
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02... Piotr Strzyzewski
- Re: [address-policy-wg] 2019-02... Sander Steffann
