This policy assumes that once the RIPE NCC pool gets 'exhausted' it will never be very large. Are we OK to continue allocating /24s in the unlikely, but possible, event that the RIPE NCC ever gets back a larger chunk?
If not, it would be better to re-write the policy to do two independent separate things: re-emphasize first-come-first-served principle including a waiting list and specify an allocation size that is dependent on the size of the pool. Just food for thought ... Daniel
